Divided loyalties.
Every been there?
The first semi wasn't a problem. Much as I would have liked to have seen Tommy polish off his fairy tale by going on to win this entire event, before hanging up his racquets and disappearing magically over a rainbow, I think we all knew he'd reached the limits of his natural abilities.
It really didn't matter what happened in Paris, there was to be no repeat performance at Wimbledon. Not now, not ever.
But didn't you just love that hand waving moment at the net, distracting Federer into sending a ball wide?
The other semi however, had me torn.
On the one hand I'd actually predicted a win for Roddick. There'd been a buzz about him since the beginning of the year. He'd been looking more robust (and more toned) ever since he hooked up with Stefanki, but I also had this weird sense that this was his time.
Which TBH I felt rather good about. He's surely played with enough heart over the years to win more than just a single Slam. And if he wasn't born in the same era as Federer I'm certain he would have at least one Wimbledon title.
And then there was Murray. With the weight of the nation, history and some 1930s cable knit on his shoulders. Overcoming Federer in four of their last five matches (all admittedly three set matches). All making it the more compelling match up.
But the best man won today.
Watching Stefanki give an interview yesterday, it was very clear that Team Roddick were taking this match very seriously. Pressed for further insights into his tactics, he terminated the interview so abruptly, the reporter must have been left reeling.
Roddick came out with a game plan and executed it to perfection.
Murray made a big deal of how well Roddick served today. But it was so much more than that.
Even his harshest critics can't have failed to notice how much he's added to his game and perhaps more importantly, how well he executed on court.
But his reaction after beating Murray today shows just how much it means to him. And ensures my support on Sunday.




3 comments:
Hey Topspin,
Divided loyalties? heehee, never been there. At least not with men's tennis since Federer.
But Randy is making it awfully hard for me to muster up cold dark thoughts about him, as I usually do for Federer's opponents just before their match. The first time I've seen him this emotional for sure. I hope he'll take down del Potro and/or Djokovic in the rankings by the end of the year. With two slam semis, he deserves it.
Very much divided: would love to see Roddick win another Slam, but would also love to see Federer up his own game to earn No. 15. Which, I guess, is what I'm ultimately hoping for from Sunday -- that Roddick brings his A+ game and game plan, and that that pushes Federer in turn into displaying what he's really got (just read Tim Henman saying that Rod needs to hope that Fed has an off day, and I'm going, "That's not a sound game plan at all, jeez").
dootsie -
I've just left a comment about how appallingly I feel the press has treated Andy Roddick.
Although I said that I was backing both the Andies, I take a disproportionate amount of satisfaction from seeing their faces rubbed in the mud. Andymonium or no Andymonium, there was no excuse for it.
Hey Mechaieh -
Welcome!
"would love to see Roddick win another Slam, but would also love to see Federer up his own game to earn No. 15."
My thoughts exactly. I really want to see Fed take #15, preferably with Pete Sampras seated in the Royal Box, but not without being tested.
Only, after seeing Roddick's emotional reaction after his win yesterday, he made it impossible for me not to root for him.
Post a Comment