Showing posts with label Stuttgart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stuttgart. Show all posts

Monday, 3 May 2010

Rome, Stuttgart Round Up…


Apologies for the lack of coverage. There’s a phrase you thought you’d never hear.


The apology is as much to myself as anyone else seeing as how Rome is meant to be my favourite clay court event.


Plenty of happenings this week, both of the Romanic and Germanic variety - no time to luxuriate in any one of them I’m afraid. Well maybe just this one.



Oh yes, we could indulge in a spot of trophy-biting again, but I much prefer Rafa doing his prancing leprechaun thing – don’t you?



Comeback complete….I should say.


With not a damn pachyderm in sight.


I’m sure there was a spanking great final played in Rome today, and congrats to Ferru for making his first Masters final and all that – I just didn’t happen to see very much of it.


As far as I’m concerned the real final took place on this very same arena 24 hours ago.


Up until that point Rafa’s dirt-ridden comeback, however dominant, remained possessed of a certain liminality – one that would seemingly only be removed by his taking down a shotmaker in cold blood.


Mission accomplished, though Ernie ensured there was nothing cold about it.


That’s the sound of pedantic analysis being swept away by a deluge of unbridled optimism.



-- Over in in Stuttgart, Juju picked up her first title of Career 2.0. with a 6-4 2-6 6-1 win over Sam Stosur, who, incidentally, will be world #8 on Monday.


Trouble is it wasn’t terribly convincing. One wonders what the result would have, could have been, had Stosur retained the focus that saw her reach a ten-match clay court streak. Similar levels of shoddiness pervaded JuJu’s route through the entire draw – with forehand-vulgaris putting in the odd, unwelcome appearance.


Difficult to complain very much when someone subdues a field comprised of seven of the world’s top ten players, without playing their best tennis.


One only wonders if such sloppier performances are to be a more regular feature of her second coming.


And whether shaping her entire comeback tour around Wimby, perhaps at the expense of her signature surface, is in fact the best approach.


Allez…I think.


-- At start of the week I confess I rather dissed Ernests Gulbis as “a haircut and a forehand” (after checking with Lendl of course).


Now I’m thinking “a haircut, a forehand and a drop shot too”, and a lot more besides - I’m also positively Samsonesque in my insistence he not clip those locks of his.


Monte Schmonte. Right here’s where the clay court season began. And when one of our most vaunted debutantes elected to announce himself.


***


And now a moments reflection for those no longer with us – or, to be more precise, those running a little thin on presence lately.


1) Biggest of big fish first.


Federer going out early at a Masters event no longer surprises anyone. I’ve long since given up trying to make sense of it. Think of it as the new world order.


Don’t have much time for the weary assumption that he doesn’t accord Masters events the same degree of respect and/or attention (Slams are ostensibly bigger fish, but how precisely does one go about marking down their levels of commitment by the commensurate 1000 ATP points?).


Easier to believe the less forgiving three set format and increased competition of the second half of his reign has something to do with it.


2) Oh Muzza….you almost had me convinced.


For one match only he played the kind of tennis that might have left you thinking, “Crisis? What Crisis?”.


Then of course he ran into Daveed Ferrer, and it was all revealed as a sham.


Not out of the thick of it just yet then, and clay will likely never host his best results, but perhaps some evidence that the Muzzanomic downturn might be shorter lived than initially anticipated.


3) Djoko shouldn’t actually be part of this list, seeing as how I thought he gave a great account of himself – his loss to Dasco certainly bore little resemblance to the haemorrhaging at Monte, and were it not for Ernie and Nadal the very next day, would have been the match of the event.


4) Dinara’s resurfaced. It didn’t last very long. Don’t call her Dina (Dinarik, or Dinarochka’s ok).


(Photos: Getty, Reuters, AFP)


Read More...

Tuesday, 5 May 2009

Slightly later than advertised Round-Up...

I've been a little busy this weekend and didn't get time to do the usual end of event round ups.

I need to do so now as its not often you get to blow your own trumpet. No, let me rephrase that. It's not often I make picks, in fact I think I might have only done it once since this blogs inception - and even then only half-
heartedly. Last week, I finally decided to stop chickening out and jump into the deep end. After all, what type of a tennis blogger goes about their business without making picks (now and again)?

(Photo Credit: Sky Sports)

I was only half right with the ladies: Dinara did get to the final but went out to Sveta who I thought wouldn't make it past the semis against a solid looking Elena. She did, and then went on to take the title too - her first since New Haven in 2007, and the first time she's got through a final (without her opponent pulling out) in ten attempts. And she did it with a kind of nonchalant, confident expression on her face (not even that much celebrating) that suggested to me that she herself recognises her own capabilities, and just how overdue this title is. Not even going for the lines very much, just executing to near perfection (and routining poor old Dinara in the process). THAT'S what I'm talking about.

If she continues to play at this level she's looking the most promising inductee into my collection of picks for
RG. The list currently goes:

(1) Elena
(2) Dinara
(3)
Sveta
(4)
Jelena

I've given the nod to Elena
simply because she's been the most solid of the four since the beginning of the year. Jankovic on the other hand, despite showing some signs of life recently, still looks shaky, and is in there only because of the fact that she's won Rome the last two years.

Regular readers will know what a big fan of
Sveta's I am, so it goes without saying how pleased I am about this. I know I've said this about a thousand times, but she's got the most complete game in the top ten, with the exception of perhaps only Venus Williams - don't think Serena volleys as well.

One other thing -
Sveta's win here makes official what many have already sensed these last few weeks: that the WTA is on an upward trajectory once again.

But my men's picks for Rome were, how shall I put this,
spot on? Not only in terms of the result but in the number of sets I thought it would take. Roger, as we all know, sadly went down to Djoko in three. Rafa came through against Gonzo in two (Ok that wasn't the hardest call in the world). And then Rafa came through against Djoko in only two sets. All exactly how I called them. Now I know many of my fellow bloggers are particularly well tuned in the art of picking matches, but this ain't half bad for a rookie's first or second attempt. Is it?

Ok I know I'm getting on your nerves now, so I'll move on to the winners and losers at Rome and Stuttgart.

Last weeks Emperors & Queens:

Novak Djokovic: This guy must be loving the clay. Nothing wrong with going out to Rafa in two. Seems ironic he'll lose the #3 spot to Murray given he's outperformed both him and Federer at this event.

Fernando Gonzales: He didn't play as well as he did in Barcelona, but still managed to get to the semis. Me thinks Gonzo's rediscovering that curiosity we call form. Be watching him over the next month or so.

Juan Monaco: Well done mate! Don't think you had a scrap of a chance against Nadal so it's probably just as well you went out to Gonzo. But beating the #4 player in the world (even if he played a horror of a match) must feel good. Feel justly proud of yourself. Go on....
Richard Gasquet: Went down fairly meekly to Nando, but only after having to play (and coming through in) two matches in the same day against Tsonga and Gulbis the day before. Not at all bad.

Dinara Safina: For sort of 'making good' by reaching the finals in her first event ranked as the world #1. Yeah, we still know who the real world #1 is, but take that anyway!

Flavia Pennetta: A good run, including a win over Jelena Jankovic.

This lot has some thinking to do:

Andy Murray: Take it easy...I'm not mad at you. I know that when it comes to clay, you're still learning the ropes so to speak. But you've surely gone beyond the stage of first round exits. No?
Marin Cilic: I dunno, maybe clay isn't his thing, and I know he went out to the guy that beat up on Murray. But that's two consecutive early losses for this bright young thing.

Giles Simon: That's it, consider me officially off the Gilles Simon Bandwagon.

Jelena Jankovic: You're not on this list for the usual reasons. A quarter final isn't bad, but is I'm sure you'll agree far below what you'd expect given you'd actually started to show signs of recovery.

Carla Suarez Navarro: I so want to make this girl my new unofficial champion of women's tennis, and I did think the clay court season would signal the start of an improvement. But we had yet another first round loss. If this continues, she'll turn into the WTA's very own Reeshard.

Read More...

Friday, 1 May 2009

Three of the Top Four...

You know what's funny? You spend week after week bemoaning the inconsistency of the top seeds and when they do all come through - you find yourself distinctly underwhelmed by it all.

There was plenty to admire today, but it was all, let's say, a little uneventful.

Novak DJOKOVIC (SRB) d. Juan Martin DEL POTRO (ARG) 63 64

Really, really solid from Novak, who continues to persuade me that all four of those cylinders really are firing again. A little unimpressed with young Juan, and the way he let it all slip away. He's been criticised for the way he slowly lumbers around between points. I find the body language (particularly when things aren't going to plan) more troubling. You just beat Rafa a couple of weeks back. You're the (justified) #5 player in the world: On the cusp of big things, by any definition. Right about now is where you stop acting like you're still playing juniors.

Roger FEDERER (SUI) d. Mischa ZVEREV (GER) 76(3) 62

You know what's good? Roger's gone all old school on us. By that I mean, he appears to be playing the efficient, as-good-as-it-need-be early round tennis of years gone by. Instead of being 'tested' by encounters with guys in the seventy-somethings. And assuming of course, he cranks it up in time, also like years gone by.

You know what's bad? If he continues to play at this level I can't see him getting past Djoko, who's playing with the kind of intensity we saw so much of early on last year.

Rafael NADAL (ESP) d. Fernando VERDASCO (ESP) 63 63

This one disappointed. Nando was spraying more balls out than he normally does, and Rafa wasn't at his best. But he didn't really need to be, as Nando's injured leg extinguished any remaining chance he might have had to remain competitive.

Fernando GONZALEZ (CHI) d. Juan MONACO (ARG) 26 63 64

It looks like Gonzales has lost some of that brilliance he dazzled us with in Barcelona last week. But I'm glad he came through purely for what he's potentially capable of against Rafa. Very much doubt anything Monaco could have brought would be treated with much respect by Rafa.

Over in Stuttgart Jelena Jankovic lost a competitive three setter to Flavia Pennetta, which means that Safina, Kuznetsova, Dementieva and Pennetta are our last four.

In case you missed it that's three of the top four seeds. I know that's not as good as three of the top four in the world, like you have over in Rome, but that's got to be a sign of good health in these slightly leaner WTA times.

Dinara over Flavia in 3. Elena over Sevta also in 3.
For the final Elena over Dinara in 3 (just think those three setters may have made Elena more match savvy).

Pains me to say this, as I think tennis could do with Roger actually behaving like he's comfortable up in the top four, but Djoko over Roger in 3. Rafa over Gonzo in two.
For the final, Rafa over Djoko in two (don't think Rafa will run the risk of allowing Djoko another three setter).

There, I've stuck my neck out now.
Read More...

Wednesday, 29 April 2009

I Almost Forgot...

I've been a little neglectful in my coverage of the WTA recently, choosing to follow some very good advice I once heard along the lines of "If you haven't anything good to say, remain silent...". But there's been a number of positive developments on the women's tour recently that I thought I should mention:

--
Sabine Lisicki, a breath of fresh air from Germany. She won her first Premier level title in Charleston two weeks back beating Venus Williams in the process, and Wozniacki in the final. She's been likened to Jenifer Capriati in her ball striking ability. He tennis ethos reminds me a little of Davydenko in that she's (at the moment) very much about all out attack and going for the lines. I can't see a problem with that approach provided she continues to hit at this very high level she's set for herself. I mentioned some tim
e back that the WTA needed something very different to breath some life back into it. Well this girl can serve at 125mph, and outside of the Williamses, that really does put a rather different slant on womens tennis. Looks like she's about to take out Patty Schnyder at the event in Stuttgart (in straight sets) as I type.

-- Caroline Wozniacki continues to play well but seems to be carving out a Kuznetsova like year for herself by making finals she doesn't win.

-- Jelena Jankovic picked up a title in Marbella (taking out Navarro in the process) and seems to be getting some of her form back. She took out a pretty lame (literally) Cibulkova today in a match that at least demonstrated she has cut out a lot of those UFEs. I'm glad she's on the up as I picked her to win at RG this year, mostly because of her stunning performances at Rome these last couple of years. That prediction is looking less certain now, but I'm not about to chicken out.

-- Elena Dementieva has lost some fizz since making a brilliant start to the year, but is still playing convincingly enough to make her my second pick for RG. I always felt she missed out on the all Russian Slam cocktail party in 2004 -- she still managed to make two of those Slam finals. Given the less competitive state of the tour right now - it's almost her right to pick up a Slam, and I'd say RG is the best place to do that.

-- Dinara Safina made a fantabulous return to action at Stuttgart yesterday, by pounding poor old Sara Errani into the dirt 6-0,6-1. It was her first match as world #1, and did of course come amidst the predictable chorus of derision. I'd love her to win at RG too, if only to stick it to the haters.

Go Dinara - You stick it to the man...

-- Less happy news with
Maria Sharapova, who's now announced she won't be back until RG. You know, it's almost got to the point now where I wish she'd take the full year off, instead of staggering it out in this will-she-won't-she way. It's got to be heart wrenching to admit to yourself you may be dealing with what's beginning to sound like a chronic injury. But she's still very,
very young. Plus RG doesn't strike me as the best place to return from rehab anyway. Ease yourself gently into the grass court season I say.

-- Victoria Azarenka went out early to Gisela Dulko today. I'm not completely convinced by what little I saw from Victoria on clay, but she was returning from injury, so I guess it'd be a little unfair to read too much into that.

-- Anyone know what the hecks going on with Ana Ivanovic?
Read More...

Wednesday, 1 October 2008

Here Come the Girls...

The women's event in Stuttgart is now well under way and Serena Williams has lost her opening match to Li Na 0-6, 6-1, 6-4.
To say this was a strange match would be like describing
Ivo Karlovic as being of 'above average height'. Although Serena exploded out of the blocks as we've seen her do so many times, she dropped form in equally dramatic fashion, allowing Li Na to raise her level close to what it was in the Olympic Games.

I'm not sure much can be read into this upset other than Serena having a very bad day at the office. Her results this year certainly suggest she's taking her tennis very seriously, so I'm going to hope this is nothing more than a blip, albeit a rather expensive one (its going to cost her the #1 ranking). She was certainly very realistic about the loss of ranking: "To be quite honest I don't deserve it playing like that; I have to step it up and I will."

Besides that high profile loss, the standard of tennis in Stuttgart thus far, has been of an immensely high standard with all of the top players playing close to the best of their ability; to be honest I can't remember the last time that happened.

Bartoli, despite an impressive performance in the first round, went out today in a very one sided match to Zvonareva who is looking better than she has all season. Victoria Azarenka, has been the other player to really stand out. She defeated Radwanska 6-1,7-5 yesterday, who for me is going through something of a Hingis phase in her career: she's one of the best tacticians on tour at the moment, making up for her lack of pace with thoughtful, incisive play, but has recently had a spate of losses to players all of whom hit the ball harder than her - she's still only 19, but you'd think something has to change soon. Read More...

Disclaimer

All images on this site have been found in the public domain.
Credit has been given wherever possible.
If you feel your copyright is being infringed upon by any particular image, please contact me and I'll have it taken it down.

You Said...

Powered by Disqus

Receive Updates by Email...

Enter your email address:

  © Free Blogger Templates Spain by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP