Saturday, 16 May 2009

My Head Hurts...


Exhaustive viewing - I took some injury timeouts of my own, and was criticised on more than one occasion for taking more than the prescribed 25 seconds to fix myself a cup of green tea.

-- Best clay court match since Fedal-Rome'06; can't actually remember a better three setter being played on any surface recently - anyone?

-- They're not going to tire for a while it seems, of telling us that this was the longest match in 3 set Masters history (what, all two years of them?), clocking up as it did a total of 4hrs and 2 mins.

-- Copious amounts of axle grease to be rubbed in the faces of those that suggested Masters Events would be bereft of all drama by the decision to restrict play to three sets instead of five.

-- Don't know who that Nadal imposter was out there in the first set. Though his crude imitation was more Roger than Rafa with all those shanked forehands and balls sailing long.

-- Djoko held three match points. I know Rafa wasn't himself in the first set, but that's the strongest indication we've had of a chink in his armour for around three years. I'm sure I saw a tear in Djoko's eye as he left the stadium. He needn't worry - there's little doubt who the second best on clay is after that match.

-- Three sets might actually have an advantage: you've got to have your intensity turned right up for the entire duration. Makes for a better quality match IMO. As good as those five set epics involving Coria were, there was a different tempo about them. You could afford to go walkabouts for a couple of games and regroup. Just like long distance running I suppose.

-- Don't be surprised if Nadal is, let's say,
not fully engaged tomorrow. This was the epicentre of the event right here. And fending of Djoko (his nearest rival right now) in the way he did might be a more meaningful victory to him anyway.

-- 'Dorando Pietri' Awards all over the place.

-- If Federer comes through tomorrow against Nadal, as all things point towards him doing, it will be an even hollower victory than Hamburg'07. No matter. Just take a look at how many hollow victories Djoko scored en route to his return to form. Here's one. Here's another one.

(Photo: AP via Yahoo! Sports)
Read More...

Friday, 15 May 2009

Theories: The Oasis

Time to talk a little Roger.

See I have a theory, or I should say
another theory, given the amount I've attempted to peddle these months gone by. Not all of them very secure.

I'm beginning to think that a return to those old fashioned routs of guys he has intimidating H2Hs against, might turn out to be the best curative for Roger and his tennis right now. Not a groundbreaking insight, but there it is.

That's the way things are meant to work. If you're struggling with the exhaustive and relentless grind of the pro circuit, or just a little under the weather - you go off and play Challengers for a while; and after beating up on lesser individuals in locations as far afield as Izmir (where you can find none other than Joachim Johansson this week) or Sarasota for a while, sometimes only in front of only a handful of people -- and in some cases having to retrieve your own balls -- you'll hopefully reemerge revived, more appreciative of how good you have it and brimming with confidence. Back to the world of business class flights and VIP boxes. Or so the theory goes.


It's how Agassi nursed his way back to a more healthy ranking after his well-publicised fall from grace.

No need for anything as dramatic as that in the case of Roger though. I think the equivalent form of rehab for him lies in playing guys he's confident of beating - top players of course, so it actually means something, and providing of course such fruitful draws are conferred upon him.

The matches he's played over the last few months -- even those he's won -- all have a laboured, constricted feel about them. There's no flourish, little enjoyment it seems, and worse still - a stifling sense of urgency about needing to find his form.

But all that might be about to change. If my theory has any sense to it at all. His match against Roddick today was certainly not 2007 all over again. But there were those occasional moments of brilliance that have all too often recently, remained in the background, shimmering away invitingly in the distance. Like a tantalising oasis that -- depending on your take -- serves either as a reminder of how close he might still be to those great things of years gone by, or a more sobering realisation that things have moved on, and spells of ethereal tennis like that are likely to be few and far between.

But make no mistake about it - this is the best draw Roger's seen since the onset of the clay court season. Villainous, vilified Robin Soderling, a guy he owns 8-0. James Blake, 8-1, his only loss to the man coming amidst that tumultuous period at the Olympics last year, surely now vindicated as the anomaly-of-all-anomalies. And then there's Andy Roddick. Not even going to get started on the sparring partner analogies - I respect the year he's had too much. But he's now a very unflattering 18-2.

And can you believe they threw Nikolay in there too, imbuing his section of the draw with an unmistakable 'pre-mono' quality.
In fact the only guy missing from this feel-good class-of-2007 reunion is David Ferrer, that other member of the '8 and oh' club.

The only thing that slightly flies in the face of the theory is that Andy Roddick, for two sets at least, played the kind of tennis that maybe just
does suggest that things may have moved on a little from 2007. He's certainly moved on posting a very healthy 26-5 for the year to date. A quarter final appearance is not at all what you might expect from him in his first event on clay this year. His first since getting married in fact.

Of course I'll only really be vindicated if Federer makes it to the final beating Murray in the process (nothing at all convincing about getting past Juan, a guy you creamed 3-0-0 in your last match) and puts in a convincing effort opposite Rafa; but I'm thinking even beating Murray here might not mean all that much given how unconvincing
he's been on clay (I'm not yet convinced Andy will even make it past Juan). But that does surely offer up an opportunity to regain some of that lost confidence.

***

And the answer to yesterdays poser, that you've no doubt already googled anyway, was of course squash's GOAT
Jahangir Khan.


There's always a debate to be had about comparisons being made across different sports; I just think that picking up a major
without dropping a point transcends all of that pretty convincingly. Not to mention how it squares up with winning Slams without dropping a set.

How's this for a training regime:

For his training, he would often start his day with a 9 mile jog which he would complete in 60-120 minutes at a moderate pace, followed by short bursts of timed sprints. Later he would weight train in the gym finally cooling down in the pools. He would follow this routine 5 days a week. On the 6th day he would match practice and rest on the 7th day.

He also said that he has experienced running on every surface - from custom-built tracks to asphalt roads, grass & farm fields to sea shores & knee-deep waters. Sometimes he would also visit the northern areas of Pakistan to train in high altitude fields under low oxygen conditions. All in all it made Jahangir one of the most physically and mentally fit athletes in the world [Source:Wikipedia].



(Federer Photo by Jasper Juinen/Getty Images via Yahoo! Sports)
Read More...

Thursday, 14 May 2009

Will the real GOAT please stand up...

81 match winning streak on clay? Pffft.

65 consecutive matches won on grass? Child's play.

148-4 on clay since 2005? Huh.

237 consecutive weeks as world #1?

Not even close...

How about being unbeaten over the course of
5 years (and 8 months)?
A staggering total of -- brace yourselves --
555 consecutive matches won.


During that incredible streak, this individual managed to pick up a major -- and this just sounds a little stupid --
without losing a single point.

"The hallmark of his play was his incredible fitness and stamina, which *** helped him build-up through a punishing training and conditioning regime. *** was quite simply the fittest player in the game, and
would wear his opponents down through long rallies played at a furious pace." [Source: Wikipedia; asterisks are my own]

That last bit in bold sounds a little like Rafa, don't you think?

"One day *** will be slightly off his game and I will get him", one of his opponents vowed for five years.

I wonder what words Rafa would've used if he had to chase the #1 ranking for 5 years. Probably something annoyingly deferential.

I guess you've picked up on the fact that we ain't talking tennis.

Here's the main point of the post though - that unbeaten run of 555 consecutive matches is not just a streak in his own sport - it's one of the
longest unbeaten runs by any athlete in top-level professional sports.

Any ideas?

You'll be required to submit proof that your answer isn't the result of a google search.
Then again maybe you won't.

Answer to be posted tomorrow.
Read More...

Wednesday, 13 May 2009

First Impressions...

Well it's been a few days now, and I know I was quite harsh with the event's '5th Slam' pretensions not to mention that glorious blue stuff, but I've had some time to form a more considered and hopefully more balanced opinion of the facilities at Madrid.

(Photo: Javier Soriano/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images)

-- The main stadium 'Manolo Santana' arena as I think it's called is a real hit with me. A sumptuous delight for the senses.

I did at first take a rather strong exception to what are presumably the more pricey seats - iron clad enclosures with holes born into them, giving a kind of futuristic 'fortressey' feel to things. Only they're less 'Star Wars' and more 'Dr Who' (the 80s edition of course that used to take pride in it's 'understated' approach to special effects). However they do have a weird charm, and really come into their own if you pan the camera back and have a look at an aerial shot of the entire stadium. It's then that their distant silvery sheen adds well to the mix of red seating and the general polished glassy feel of the surroundings. These are the only pictures I could find, and don't do the venue justice I feel - try, as I say to catch an aerial view of of the stadium during live coverage.


-- Not a fan of the 'box trap' approach to roofing (see first pic): the way they're kept at a kind of half tilt during matches. It may look great as a promotional image, and I'm sure it's a wonderful feat of technical wizardry that ensures the roofs are opened and shut quicker than you can say 'Mutua Madrilena', but also unfortunately gives proceedings a distinctly 'indoor' feel. Even when the sun's out.

-- Ditto with the
Aranxta Sanchez Vicario and other outside arenas. I wonder how she feels about having such a dimly lit arena named after her. What little natural light is available is obscured by the edges of a partially covered roof, giving the whole arena a 'cauldron' effect. In fact it's more well lit when the sun goes down and the indoor lighting kicks in. Hindsight's a wonderful (and annoying) thing but I'm sure it's not just me that feels that roof should have been built a little higher. The only positive thing about the stadium comes in the form of the unintrusive white panelling on the upper portions of the walls - the white squares providing the feel of what looks like unintended Japanese decor. They also make the stadium look a bit like an old Dojo - or, given the earthy feel of the clay court surface, a Sumo Wrestling arena.

-- Outside of the stadium and around the grounds, it's as polished as ever - but there's also far too much metal on show - and not of the sleek, modern variety. No, I speak of the cagey, almost penal look (thanks to Marcus Buckland of Sky Sports for that description) of some of the walkways, that at times feel a little like a building site. But that's
ok, as it is a work in progress and I understand they've planted vines across those walkways that will intertwine with the caging, giving a Wimbledon-like ivy clad look to things.

-- The website sucks. It's clearly been designed by someone who thinks 'laterally' - and not in a good way. Most pages require you to navigate an unwieldy horizontal
scrollbar to get at what are usually the most pertinent bits of information (that on other sites would be the most accessible). The alternating garish background colours are particularly offensive bearing a resemblance to the colour schemes employed by some of the 8-bit home computers in the eighties.

***

As to the tennis, both of the Williamses, Dementieva and Kuznetsova are out in their opening or 3rd round matches. Not great for my RG picks. Particularly disappointed by Dementieva, although you've gotta love the elegant way Amelie closed out that last set. Safina and Jankovic to hold fort then.

Two other shockers in the men's event today. Blake came through in what looked like three tough sets against Dr Ivo today. Continuing to love the whole 'I can do clay' thing from Blake, though he plays Federer next, so I'm thinking that's about to come to an end along with my wavering loyalty.

And how about Ferrer going out to Monaco in straight sets? Monaco's beginning to take on the kind of giant killer role that Tipsarevic held around two years ago. Not a great fan of that kind of game, but I did after all issue a call to arms for the 'real' clay courters to take back what the top four (and a number of others) have taken from them - so I've gotta credit him for stepping up.

Top 4? Rafa and Djoko through very convincingly. Andy and Roger, rather less so. Roger's first set against Robin Soderling had the look of a bagel, but Robin managed to claw a game back losing it 6-1. The second set however went all the way to 5-5 before Roger took the remaining two games. It's now got to the point where I almost wish Roger would come out all guns blazing, yanking the rug from underneath his opponents, and finishing in two very quick scorching sets. rather than putting us through these ulcer-inducing episodes.

Robin seems to be something of a hate figure after his Rafa impersonation at Wimbledon a couple of years back - a tactless protest at the amount of time Rafa takes in between points.
Nasty episode. Bad, bad Robin.

Angry throng of fork-wielding Rafanatics aside, I can't stand the man's forehand. I previously thought Radek Stepanek had the worst forehand on tour. How he makes one of the most elegant shots in tennis look so sloppy I'll never understand. What I do know is Robin has surpassed him in sheer ugliness. His exaggerated take back gives the stroke the look of a rioter flinging a burning rail into a police flank.

Fedophiles and Rafanatics stand united on this one....
Read More...

Tuesday, 12 May 2009

Cover Your Eyes!

Found some pics of the dreaded "blue dirt" at Madrid. Enjoy.

"Abandon hope all ye who enter here..."
(Photo: AFP/Getty Images via Eurosport)


I'm more concerned by what might lie behind those curtains...
(Photo: Dani Pozo/AFP/Getty Images via Yahoo! Sports)

A
ll a little "Vaudevillean Freakshow". Or "Hammer Horror". Read More...

Monday, 11 May 2009

Ana the 'Perfectionist'...

You know what's been notably absent recently? News on the whereabouts of Ana Ivanovic. Her game as well as her personage.

Aside from her early round exit at Rome she hasn't played any sort of clay court tennis since that Fed Cup Tie against Italy three weeks ago, and even then it was only a single match.

That makes her 2-1 in clay court matches this year. A total of three matches going into RG, now that a knee injury has put paid to her ambitions at Madrid. Poor timing, no?


Keeping that in mind, this article from the The Times made interesting reading, giving her own thoughts on why it's proven to be such a struggle to remain competitive since picking up a Slam almost a full year ago. It also touches briefly on the work she's been putting in with Kardon and her physical trainer Scott Byrnes.

The message that seems to be coming out is that it's Ana's own intensity that has been her undoing. We have her all wrong apparently: far from being the deer in the headlights devoid of the kind of sustained intensity the #1 spot demands, she's actually an exacting perfectionist intolerant of anything other than her very best.


“Because I am a perfectionist, I had just assumed I would play perfectly all the time, but I have learnt that in those times I have to find a way to win and I am much more OK with that. I am very excited about what is around the corner, but I do need to stay in the moment.”

...


“I am a very emotional person in general and I get really fired up, especially in a competitive situation. I didn't know how to handle things before but it is important to realise that you are not going to be at the top of your game all the time. There are going to be setbacks and real champions adjust to that. You might lose, but you must never lose the belief in yourself. I have won the French, I have won big tournaments and I know I can do it again.”



(Source: The Times)


It's pretty clear that Ana hasn't yet learnt to come through matches where she's not playing her best tennis, and I'm not at all surprised to learn that she finds it difficult to deal with that. But I'm not sure I'd characterise that as being the product of an over exacting nature. That's the kind of charge I'd level against someone like Azarenka, who as you probably know isn't my favourite person right now. Ana's problems seem to have more to do with simply not knowing what to do when plan A fails.


The thing about Ana's game is it's actually quite simple. And sometimes a good old-fashioned return to simplicity serves you best. Net rushes and agility were never her strengths though it is encouraging to see how much work she's put in there.

But if those groundstrokes -- which really are exacting -- are firing off both wings (particularly that very classic looking forehand that can do so much damage) and she manages to start tossing the ball properly again (she did actually have quite a good serve if you can remember that far back), a semi final run at RG would, I'd have thought, be an attainable target.


I'm not suggesting that the interview was contrived to present her in a more positive light; I'm actually thinking that this is one of those over zealous mind-bending exercises in positivity - an attempt on the part of Kardon to turn her weaknesses into strengths, her 'problems' as they say, into 'opportunities'. You see where I'm headed with this? If Ana continues to talk this way in public as well as private, she may actually start to believe it. And some of that might rub off on her on-court performances.

Nothing wrong with this type of mental coaching of course, if that's what it is, and if it brings about the desired result. I, for one, wouldn't mind seeing her return to some sort of form.


***

Sharapova's return to action at Warsaw next week is on the face of it a good thing. Good for the tour, and good I imagine for her own confidence too, to get back out there in the cut and thrust of it all.

(Photo: AFP)

It's just I can't help feeling that this is something of a 'lose-lose' situation. For one thing a return from an injury as serious as this appears to be, on a surface as notoriously problematic as clay, appears to me to be a little ill-advised. Especially for Sharapova.

No matter, you might think - after all, she needn't push herself to the brink of injury, the objective at this stage must surely only be to get back on court in a live match situation. Well yes, but I wonder how competitive she can really be playing at around 65-70% with a partially recovered shoulder on her least convincing surface.

More importantly though what's an early loss in a situation like that going to do for her confidence ahead of the grass court season?

I'd have preferred a return to action at one of the lower end grass court events. But I'm looking forward to being both surprised and proved wrong. What could be a better curative for the tour right now than something as improbable as a good run from Sharapova at RG?
Read More...

Sunday, 10 May 2009

Clay Court Blues...

I've always had a soft spot for green American clay courts. For one thing, they aren't green - closer I'd say to a kind of slatey grey.

But it also seems like a stirring act of defiance in a tennis world where big brother says you can play on any coloured court you want provided it's blue.

Just like the Aussie Open in fact, that until this year was played on a distinctive, instantly recognisable green surface.

I wasn't a great fan of that particular shade of green, and I have to say the blue looks far better. But it was quaint, it was distinctive and like I say, you instantly knew you were in Melbourne.

But I made my peace with that, as it was after all a hard court event.

However I consider it a step too far when you begin messing with different surfaces, as the Madrid event organisers, in a stupefying display of boorishness, looked set to do with their attempt to stage the event on blue clay.

That really is as absurd as it sounds. Thankfully someone in the ATP saw fit to put an end to it all.

I was already a little uneasy with the sounds being emitted from Madrid; particularly it's promotion as "the fifth slam". I thought Indian Wells and Miami already played that card - and to be frank, they don't always carry it off very well either.

In any event wouldn't it be more tactful to run the tournament for at least one season before making these types of claims? Strikes me as pretty disrespectful to Rome, Monte Carlo and even Hamburg - an event that has history dating back to the late nineteenth century.

But that's nothing compared with the warped world of Clay Court Blues.

How soon before we see 'bluegrass' played at Wimbledon?

Don't those in charge feel we already have enough event played on blue courts - must we now also add events played on different surfaces to that group?

Not surprised that Rafa, Roger and Serena appear to agree...
Read More...

Disclaimer

All images on this site have been found in the public domain.
Credit has been given wherever possible.
If you feel your copyright is being infringed upon by any particular image, please contact me and I'll have it taken it down.

You Said...

Powered by Disqus

Receive Updates by Email...

Enter your email address:

  © Free Blogger Templates Spain by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP